<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Repurposed Garments by Maison Martin Margiela</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designcrack.com/v2/2006/10/31/repurposed-garments-by-maison-martin-margiela/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designcrack.com/v2/2006/10/31/repurposed-garments-by-maison-martin-margiela/</link>
	<description>Design Crack: High Concept, Beautiful, and Clever Design, Fashion, and Architecture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:48:15 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Design Crack &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brand Crack: The Louis Vuitton $42,000 Handbag</title>
		<link>http://designcrack.com/v2/2006/10/31/repurposed-garments-by-maison-martin-margiela/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Design Crack &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brand Crack: The Louis Vuitton $42,000 Handbag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designcrack.com/v2/2006/10/31/repurposed-garments-by-maison-martin-margiela/#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>[...] Maybe I watch too much crappy television? I don&#8217;t know. But, I was watching the Preview Channel - you know, the channel that scrolls the TV guide at the bottom while washed up child actors talk celebrity gossip- the other day when the woman on the show started barking on and on about Louis Vuitton&#8217;s $42,000 handbag. She, of course, mentioned how something so ugly could cost so much. Then I did some more digging and found that every blog on earth, including mine now, had blogged about it. Incidentally, I found it on Fashionator first. These blogs are fun, but I was more interested in this piece because it&#8217;s the first large fashion house to be swept up in a this recent patchwork micro-trend. The trend probably re-emerged at Burning Man, as many god awful (and wonderful) trends seem to do, but the first I had noticed it with someone who I would consider a top fashion designer was with Maison Martin Margiela. Martin Margiela&#8217;s work is so much more completely aesthetically thought-out compared to the Louis Vuitton piece, though. Shoot. I really wish I could continue, but I&#8217;ve got to go to work now. Expect this re-written by Monday. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Maybe I watch too much crappy television? I don&#8217;t know. But, I was watching the Preview Channel &#8211; you know, the channel that scrolls the TV guide at the bottom while washed up child actors talk celebrity gossip- the other day when the woman on the show started barking on and on about Louis Vuitton&#8217;s $42,000 handbag. She, of course, mentioned how something so ugly could cost so much. Then I did some more digging and found that every blog on earth, including mine now, had blogged about it. Incidentally, I found it on Fashionator first. These blogs are fun, but I was more interested in this piece because it&#8217;s the first large fashion house to be swept up in a this recent patchwork micro-trend. The trend probably re-emerged at Burning Man, as many god awful (and wonderful) trends seem to do, but the first I had noticed it with someone who I would consider a top fashion designer was with Maison Martin Margiela. Martin Margiela&#8217;s work is so much more completely aesthetically thought-out compared to the Louis Vuitton piece, though. Shoot. I really wish I could continue, but I&#8217;ve got to go to work now. Expect this re-written by Monday. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
